Adding a warehouse worker to a system you own should not cost you anything, so it does not. What costs money is us building it and running it while your people take over, and that is the whole of what you pay for. Every number below is fixed before we start.
Ten thousand to build it. A thousand a month to run it, extend it and keep it current. There is no third line, nothing that grows with your headcount, and nothing that switches off on the day you stop paying.
The whole first year, with nothing left off it. Every line here is known before you sign, and there is nothing that appears in month four because somebody discovered a module was extra.
Year two is €12,000 if you keep us, and nothing at all if you do not, because the system is yours and it does not stop. A second contour, whenever you decide you want one, is another three weeks at €10,000. Your own infrastructure bill at this size is typically under €100 a month.
We are not going to put words in a competitor's mouth. Take the proposal on your desk, type in its four numbers, and the comparison writes itself. Include the implementation fee, because that is the line that actually decides this.
Count the warehouse and the office. Per seat pricing usually does.
The figure on the quote, not the list price on the website.
Setup, configuration, migration, training. The line most comparisons quietly leave out.
Both columns count what leaves your bank account. Ours is one contour at €10,000 plus €1,000 a month, which already includes the engineering, the updates and the support; there is no partner behind us with a day rate. Your own server is not in either column and runs under €100 a month at this size.
We can write this because building is no longer the expensive part. It is also the fastest way to end an argument about whether three weeks is a real number.
Two days of reading your live systems and counting what is actually in them, ending in a written scope you either recognise as your business or you do not. You owe nothing for it, and if the answer is that we are wrong for you, it says that instead.